
-http://current.com/items/88942402/is_nuclear_energy_a_clean_solution_for_global_warming.htm
As we examine nuclear power and the "dangers and risks" associated with it, most people fail to take in to account the extreme dangers in coal mining. If we are examining risk assessment, we have to examine all variables to understand the risk associated with the idea. I truly believe there is no complete way to have risk assessment because of the extreme amount of variables involved with every equation. Frequency * Impact = Risk is simply the best option we have at this point and provides a notion to what we are looking at. With nuclear power, we would have to examine the ease at which radioactive material is mined, the dangers of handling, transporting, and storing it. What is the potential for disaster occurring, how often could it occur and what would be the impact of this event are all important questions that need to be assessed. With coal, we have to examine health hazards, mining issues, and environmental impacts. There are so many more options that need to be taken into account as well. There is simply no true way to account for a viable option one way or another and that is why is continues to be such a highly debated topic around the world today. Unfortunately, every option we have contain certain risks that need to be considered. Some have more costly impact, some have more common frequency. In order to have a successful plan, it needs to be balanced and since there is no true answer out there for us, having a balanced energy portfolio is essential to ensuring the meeting of our energy needs in this country.
No comments:
Post a Comment